What is funny about this Washington Post report is the language used. Much of the article sounds like double entendre for America’s racist relationship to blackness:
“99.955% black” (The one-drop rule gone wrong.)
“A Roach Motel” (Ick!)
“Voraciously sucking up all surrounding” (They are moving in.)
“It can give those who gaze on it a dizzying sensation” (Protect your women!)
“Invisible” (This speaks for itself.)
If you think Brotherdoc and I are reading too much into the Post article, consider how Robert Moore (1992) in his essay “Racist Stereotyping in the English Language” explains how we might interpret “black” words:
“Some may blackly accuse me of trying to blacken the English language, to give it a black eye by writing such black words. They may denigrate me by accusing me of being blackhearted, of having a black outlook on life, of being a blackguard—which would certainly be a black mark against me. Some may black-brow me and hope that a black cat crosses in front of me because of this black deed. I may become a black sheep, who will be black-balled by being placed on a blacklist in an attempt to blackmail me to retract my words.”
According to Moore, if you give us a pass on our interpretation, well, you aren’t being niggardly, rather… that’s very white of you.
1 comment:
OK Brotherdoc's comments on the same subject were pretty funny. How about new careers for you two, "Husband and wife team up as social commentaters." Think about it.
Post a Comment